Basketball from a fans perspective
Published Monday, Wednesday,
Friday, Saturday & Sunday
Big Game
James Worthy is one of
the Lakers’ greatest players, he was one of the keys to the Showtime Lakers of
the ‘80’s. After his retirement Big Game James as he was nicknamed would
be enshrined in the Naismith Hall of Fame. Worthy was given the tag because it
seemed whenever the Lakers had an important or Big Game he almost always
performed well. The history how the Lakers acquired the 6 foot 9 Worthy is a
story in itself, after all they were already a good team when he was acquired.
Truth is in 1982 (the Worthy
draft) the Lakers had won 57 games during the regular season they concluded by winning
the NBA championship. Yesterday you read a portion of the history why Ted
Stepien of the Cavs was the worst owner in NBA history, sorrier than Donald
Sterling. In 1979 the Lakers acquired the Cavs number one pick in a trade that
resulted in the Lakers choosing Big Game James Worthy. Although this exchange was
made prior to the later imposed “Stepien Rule” it provides evidence of how miss-managed
the Cavs organization had become under this owner. It’s unclear how scouting
was conducted at the time however Worthy must have been at the top of
everyone’s list of talent in 1982. Can you imagine this series of events, one
of the best college players in the nation being selected by a team that already
contained Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Magic Johnson and Bob McAdoo to name just a few
on the roster.
You cannot make this
stuff up, it occurred. This is but one more example why NBA owners were assured
someone other than Stepien should be the owner of the Cleveland franchise. Fans
don’t support losing teams and attendance began to suffer, with that Stepien
threatened (his prerogative) to move the team several times. He said publicly
“the NBA had too many black players and not enough white ones, the league
should be more balanced.” It was not as much what he said it was the manner he
said it.
NIL
The headline has become
familiar to those of us who follow college basketball. It’s Name, Image
& Likeness…simply stated college and now high school players can
earn income. The days of most college athletes lacking finances no longer
exists provided they have a NIL contract in hand. For a number of old timers
this is the dawn of a new day, the line between amateur and professional
athletes has become very much blurred in the 21st Century. This is only an
observation but NIL and the transfer portal have impacted college coaching.
Several high profile
basketball coaches have retired over the last 2-3 years due to these twin
reasons. The latest beneficiary of NIL is the top rated college prospect for
2025 AJ Dybantsa, he’s a 6 foot 9 200 pound forward. Dybantsa at Utah Prep
recently signed a $4 million deal with the Nike brand. I’m going to raise an
issue and this is the example. Kansas is an Adidas school, if Dybantsa played
for the Jayhawks would he be able to wear his Nike apparel. The latter portion
is speculation, the Nike contract is for real and to my understanding Dybantsa
is the first high school talent to secure such an agreement.
He’s
activated
If you are a member of
Laker Nation you realize a fact. The Lakers need a Big Man (besides AD), as
this is written I’m unsure if there is a trade involved, a free agent signing
(Dwight Howard) or someone else. Although he appears raw and untested could
that Big Man be Christan Koloko? Tuesday evening came the announcement Koloko
had been activated, this is certainly much sooner than this member of Laker
Nation expected.
What does he bring to
the table, I’m happy you asked the question. As a reminder Koloko from Cameroon
stands 7 feet in height and weighs 230 pounds but it’s the other thing he
possesses. Koloko has a 7 foot 5.25 inch wingspan which places him near the top
of current NBA players. Of course the Spurs Victor Wembanyama’s 8 foot wingspan
is number one. I’ve never witnessed Koloko in action so he becomes a work in
progress. Expect to see him in the Laker lineup over the next few weeks as JJ
Redick moves him into the ensemble of the team. (He played last night against the Sixers briefly).
Revisionist
history
Some of you reading this
might remember the late Tex Winter, this longtime head
coach served as an assistant to Phil Jackson with the Bulls and Lakers. You
might remember the triangle offense employed by both teams, Winter didn’t
invent it but was responsible for incorporating it into the NBA. Now that’s out
of the way the subject at hand Patrick Ewing. I am unsure why this 1998
interview in Slam Magazine is being highlighted in 2024, nothing changes except
the thought.
It’s Winter’s view the
Knicks utilized Ewing in not the most effective manner to help the team. Winter
claims the center became the focal point for the offense when it should have
been in another area. *“They utilized him on the post as a scorer more than
anything else, and he could have been more effective if they had concentrated
on him being more of a feeder and a rebounder. The team has not been as
effective as it should be with a dominant center like that, but I don’t know if
that’s Patrick’s fault. He’s not the coach.” Some might remember at Georgetown
that was primarily the role Ewing played, his offensive game was limited. So all
these years later in the words of Tex Winter the Knicks failed to utilize Ewing
in an effective manner from his viewpoint. To hear this from a distinct
perspective I did this.
I have a friend from New
York now living in KC, I contacted him with the Tex Winter account. These are
the thoughts and words of David. “Tex is a shmuck. You know, it’s great that he
produced the triangle offense, but keep in mind that didn’t go into effect
until Phil Jackson instituted it in the 90’s. Pat (Ewing) was the #1 draft
pick, completely dominant for 4 years, and when he came to the Knicks, he
wasn’t the focal point…Bernard King was and then even after that he and Bill
Cartwright were sharing the spot as the twin towers.” As you can see my friend
has a completely different view over that expressed by Tex Winter.
*Slam Magazine
No NBA
TV?
Each professional sport
has branched out creating its own network. The NFL operates the NFL Network, for
baseball it’s MLB Network, even hockey has the NHL Network. The NBA has NBA TV
for now, it might not exist at some date in the future. No, the NBA is not
going away however the channel that provides game updates, draft information
and nostalgia programming might be forced to cease operations. The network is
operated by Warner Brothers Discovery, by now you are aware beginning in the
2025-26 season will see new broadcast members.
Among the missing will
certainly be TNT and possibly NBA TV. There are factors at work which a few
years ago would be unimaginable just a brief time ago. According to reports
viewership numbers have been sliding for the past few years with no
explanation. NBA TV is a source for me for a select number of games, under the
new broadcast agreement a smaller number of games will be available with the
leagues new deal with ESPN, NBC and Amazon. This is me talking (or typing), I
cannot imagine the NBA not operating NBA TV in some method once the agreement becomes
official next season.