This is old news now
The word from
Minnesota
Wolves owner Glen Taylor is searching for a
buyer. He's not ready to give up ownership just yet. Reports indicate at
71-years of age he thinks it prudent to search for a minority partner to
eventually assume full ownership. I found it interesting he stated "there
is no problem with locating a new owner we want an owner willing to keep the
team here." I've flip-flopped on the issues of local ownership issue on
several occasions. The Kansas City Chiefs have maintained a presence in Kansas
City since 1963 without local ownership. The late Lamar Hunt a founder of the
American Football League moved the Texans to Kansas City, they were re-named the
Chiefs. Since Hunt's death son Clark has given every indication the team will
remain in Kansas City. As for our local pro sports history here it's somewhat
spotted, the Kansas City A's were never locally owned same as the NHL Scouts. The NBA Kings were locally
owned for a period of time however two years prior to moving the team was sold to outside interests. As for
the baseball Royals, the original owner the late Ewing Kaufmann had Kansas City
ties. The present owners live in Arkansas and are only tied here by ownership
of the team. What's your point Larry detailing all of Kansas City's
sports history? I can understand Taylor's desire for local ownership of the
Wolves franchise. There are varying reasons why each of the franchises
mentioned left the city but the key for me none had local ownership at the time
they left the city..
Wonder if he'll make
it
Kyle Weems is one of those players whose managed
to fly beneath the radar to a degree, however
he was player of the year in the Missouri Valley Conference his junior
year. Weems was 4-year starter at Missouri
State and managed to grow his game significantly over his time in the
Springfield (MO) university. Weems is a 6-7 225 pound small forward with
shooting range, he is not a player who is not going to wow you with his athletic
skills but is steady. He managed to
impress scouts enough at the Portsmouth (VA) tournament indications are he will
pop up on some NBA team's summer league roster. Is the NBA in the future for
Kyle Weems? It depends, excluding talent a players best shot is location,
location, location. We could point out Jeremy Lin as the location example, the
Knicks were his third team during his brief NBA start. I'm not forecasting
stardom for Weems or Lin for that matter but the team and location certainly
aids a players development.
"Some guys play to win others play to
play"
That was the statement made by Scott Van Pelt on
his ESPN radio program, he and his radio partner were debating the
value of Carmelo Anthony to the Knicks. In an attempt to be fair to Anthony
is certainly not responsible for all the bad play exhibited by the Knicks . Van
Pelt said this about Anthony, "he's not LeBron James nor Kobe
Bryant, on the other hand he's not Joe Johnson either." Anthony will
never lead a team to the promised land but neither will Joe Johnson who is paid
huge sums of money. This is not a hate Carmelo rant many (including me) remain
unsold on the guy. He certainly made the Nuggets a better basketball team but
only once did they advance past the first round. The Knicks (to date) are no
better and maybe in a sense we are being unfair, everyone who witnessed the two
play knew Wilt Chamberlain was the superior player over Bill Russell. The two
had numerous regular season and post-season playoff battles, the majority of
times Russell's Celtics came out the victor. Russell received the greater amount of praise because his
Celtic teams won NBA championships. The praise
was not bestowed on Russell because he was the better player, Russell admits it
and so did Wilt.
Stop stealing my
ideas!
I wish Dan Patrick would quite stealing my
proposals! Only joking folks, Patrick makes me state "why didn't I think of
that?" His latest proposal, do away with the collegiate coaches
poll. The conversation with his studio crew involved college football but it might be even more critical for
basketball. Collegiate football teams only play once a week, in some
conferences they might even have a bye-week. There are not enough hours in the
day (or night) to review the progress of 25 teams most of which are probably not
in his conference. At the sometime his team might practice 4 days of the week,
when he's not at practice he might be reviewing tape of the upcoming opposing
team, when does he have time to fill out a ballot? Patrick even hints it might not be the coach filling out the
ballot. He suggests "it may be an assistant coach and his vote might be based to
a degree on whether the head
coach likes the other
coach." In basketball the time
constraints are even worst, a team might
play Monday, then possibly a midweek game and then again on Saturday or
Sunday. On top of this a larger number of universities compete in basketball
versus football. Two examples, tiny St. Bonaventure in New York State with an
enrollment of 2,000 has a division one basketball program. The University of
Missouri-Kansas City has no football team but
the Kangaroos play at the division one level. Eliminating the coaches poll in both sports makes sense to
me---good one Dan Patrick.