Published Monday thru Friday
Basketball from a fans
perspective
Suppose the NBA might be better
After writing such a
glowing report on Emoni Bates yesterday I decided to clarify aspects of my
account. I hope no one reading my justification for his performance might
believe I was making a claim Bates was on the road to an NBA All Pro career. This
is the fact as I see it, there have been several players over the years who
turned out to be better NBA players than college. I’ve read and heard NBA
scouts and front office folks say this, “__________ will be a better NBA player
than college, he won’t have to contend with the junk defenses intended to slow
him down.” In addition Bates must have impressed someone besides this writer, the
NBA Summer League second team contains his name.
How to build an NBA Championship team
I have absolutely no
idea how to build an NBA champion however I can share
with you what I believe is required. There are two schools of thought on this
process, the first, we build our team by trading for talent or free agent
signing. The second group says our championship team will be constructed through
the draft. The OKC Thunder belong to the second group, I have not checked the
figure but trust the information. According to bleacherreport.com the Thunder
have 35 draft picks over the next 7 years. Consider this a moment, there are
only 30 draft picks in each round. The Thunder might be able to choose every
player in the first round and into the second round concluding with number 35.
The question for now, how
exactly are they going to manage this plethora of draft choices. One of my
complaints about my Lakers in the past is that they have done an excellent job
drafting talent however it’s not been infused into their lineup. Most of those
drafted have been traded to acquire veteran talent. I believe this to be
correct, the Thunder as this is written are the youngest average age team in
the NBA. They have been quite shrewd in drafting talent however the process
must end at some point. I believe the 2023-24 season they must begin to show
progress, they must earn a playoff berth and move into the power ranks of the
NBA. The primary reason there is no one answer is simple. We’ve seen failures for
teams utilizing both methods to build a championship contender.
He was caught in the scandal too
You might remember the
Connie Hawkins story I covered recently, he was banned from playing in the NBA
due to a 1960 college betting scandal. There were other players impacted by
this stain on college basketball, one of these was Roger Brown. Brown, unlike Hawkins,
was exceptionally good but apparently didn’t have the creed of Hawkins coming
out of high school. He was another New York City basketball talent and also
from the Brooklyn borough. Just like Hawkins there was nothing pointing to
Brown shaving any points, similar to Hawkins he was acquainted with the
gambling ringleader. The University of Dayton banned Brown from play and the
NBA would later follow suit. The 6-foot 5 Brown would continue to play
basketball around the Dayton area until 1967.
That season would see
him become the first player the Indiana Pacers would sign. Over the course of
his ABA career playing for several teams he was an ABA champion three times,
Brown was 1970 ABA Playoffs MVP. The date is unclear however unlike Hawkins he
never played in the NBA although the league relinquished its ban. Brown retired
in 1975 and several years later served as an assistant coach for the Pacers. He
would later serve on the Indianapolis City-County Council for four years, in
1996 he was diagnosed with colon cancer and died the following year. In
February 2013 the Naismith Hall of Fame’s ABA committee recommended him for
induction, September witnessed him being enshrined posthumously. As for the
lifetime ban by the NBA for Hawkins, Brown and others I’m unsure if such a
miscarriage of justice would occur now. Surely there must have been proof of
involvement rather than simply being an acquaintance of someone, the 1960
scandal will be covered later.
How many, that many?
You might remember our
discussion on the number of Division I basketball programs across the nation.
Well that level of basketball receives the most coverage however the sport is
played at other levels too. There is NCAA Division II and III plus NAIA schools,
have you ever wondered about the number, maybe you haven’t but I certainly
have? If you remember we discovered there are 351 Division I schools, in
Division II the total is 312 and Division III is 418. For the National
Association of Intercollegiate Athletic or NAIA schools their members total
230.
Together the number of
colleges and universities with basketball programs total 1,311. One school
stands out for its uniqueness, Simon Fraser University in Burnaby B.C. Canada
holds an NAIA affiliation, Burnaby sits next door to Vancouver. There are other
Canadian colleges and universities fielding competitive basketball teams but
Simon Fraser is the only non-U.S. school. Allow a bit of clarification at this
point, colleges and universities in Hawaii plus the University of the Virgin
Islands and San Juan University in Puerto Rico also are included in the U.S.
count although they are not connected to the geographical United States.
The Wemby factor
Will Victor Wembanyama
become a superstar in the NBA, I haven’t a clue? Can we guarantee Wemby will have
a modicum of basketball success at this level, I haven’t a clue? This is my
intent in the middle of summer, I’m going to wait until the season begins to
even attempt a half-hearted assessment of Wemby’s skill level. This is a
cautionary tale for one reason alone, we just don’t know. The Pistons made
Darko Milicic the second pick in the first round of the 2003 NBA draft, he
stood 7 feet and 250 pounds. NBA star written all over him except that wasn’t
the case. In 2013 we thought Anthony Bennett was going to be the face of the
year for the Cavs, but we discovered that would not be the case.
In 2019 the Pelicans
made Zion Williamson top pick in the draft we thought “he’d be a superstar.” Unlike
Bennett who just couldn’t play at the NBA level, a series of injuries have
managed to keep Williamson off the court for an extended period of his NBA
career. The jury is still out on Williamson he’s only 23 years old, he still
has time however its believed Pelicans management has become concerned. Back to
Wemby, the hype machine has been running overtime since his Metropolitans 92
team played G-League Elite in the fall of 2022. He clearly demonstrated he was
talented however that was not the best of the best NBA players Wemby
faced despite his domination. I’ve read some of your letters and a few of you
desire a guarantee of future stardom for Wemby and there is no way that can
occur. Truth is I could be 2-3 years before we are able to fully determine his
ability.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.