A basketball fans perspective

Sunday, Monday, Wednesday & Friday

Things you do while waiting on the finals

This account is written Monday morning while waiting on the Finals to begin tonight. I wish to share information I uncovered while surfing the net. These NBA Finals will be broadcast to more than 214 countries and nations world-wide. The Finals are localized and broadcasters will describe the action in up to 60 different languages. Based on this information I decided to check the Super Bowl and World Series for their numbers. According to information uncovered The Super Bowl is broadcast to 195 countries and territories around the world in 25 different languages. Baseball’s World Series is available in over 200 nations and territories and 15 languages.

The NHL Stanley Cup is broadcast to 200 countries and nations, information related to broadcast languages was not provided by the league. For your further information MLS doesn’t release any numbers and the same goes for the National Women’s Soccer League. A further thought, in the U.S. the Finals are being broadcast by ABC, although it’s not clear at present it might be NBC next season but what about the future? Could we have an NBA Finals exclusively on one of the streaming services such as Prime or Peacock? We haven’t traveled far enough down the road for that decision however this is my belief, the Finals will always remain on broadcast television (I hope). Regular season games are a different matter for the NBA.

It’s okay, you can paint me a hater

In the middle of last month I drove the 130 or so I-70 miles to Columbia MO to attend graduation ceremonies at the University of Missouri, that was on a Friday. On Saturday while viewing the news on one of the local television stations up popped video and a short story on the graduation at Kansas University. I don’t monitor all the locals however there was no mention or coverage of the events at Mizzou. I guess there could have been a Kansas athlete graduating although there was no mention of it. That’s where this rant begins, it seems that once Mizzou left the Big 12 for the SEC with the exception of the print Kansas City Star local television and sports talk radio give Mizzou superficial coverage. A portion of the unbalanced coverage is understandable.

Kansas basketball is steeped in tradition and history while Mizzou over the last few years has struggled at times on the court. Despite what I just wrote this unbalanced coverage extends in the football season as well. Since 2012 Kansas has won 43 games and lost 124, in the same time period contrast that with Mizzou’s 112-78 record which includes 8 bowl invitations. Last season Kansas finished with 5 wins and 7 losses a repeat from the prior season, as for Mizzou it was 8 wins and 5 losses. Turning to men’s basketball Kansas finished the season with a 24-11 mark, for Mizzou it was 20-13. In closing I’m not comfortable but will concede, the winning tradition plus a hall of fame coach that bodes well in favor of Kansas basketball, the football is a truly different matter. Manhattan KS (Big-12 Kansas State) is a great deal nearer the metro over Athens GA (SEC-University of Georgia) so there is that to contend with!

Say what

Yes, it was certainly shoddy, I speak of the 7th game of Thunder power forward/center Chet Holmgren. If you watched the game you were a witness, in 33 minutes of action he scored but 4 points while taking only two shots. Also included in his totals, 4 rebounds 2 assists and 2 blocked shots. Despite the negatives I’m not ready to fire him but Stephen A. Smith of ESPN more or less hinted as much. I watched his First Take program on Monday to gather “a degree of wisdom,” the first thing out of his mouth; “If I’m in charge he (Holmgren) would be headed out of town” or something quite similar. Friends, Holmgren was voted to the NBA All-Star team, he was NBA All-Pro Third team. In addition voting for the Defensive Player of the Year found him finishing second to Wemby so I wanted to set the stage prior to proceeding.

I would be pleased SAS is not my general manager otherwise one poor game and BAM, I’m traded to another team. Listen folks I get it, Holmgren had a poor series against the Spurs and an even poorer Finals game but what about others? When the spotlight shone brightly on Steph Curry even he came up short once. In Game 7 of the 2016 Finals in a loss we saw Steph score 17 points on 6-19 shooting (32%). James Harden has changed zip codes a number of times most at his request. Recently he came up short in the Game four sweep by the Knicks, Harden scored 12 points on 25% shooting. The Warriors didn’t trade Steph and unless he requests a trade it appears there will be no move by the Cavs regarding Harden. I will repeat it, it’s great for Holmgren he’s got Sam Presti as GM over Stephen A. Smith. But in closing, what do I know, I’m only a basketball fan?

The future is now

This is partially related to the NBA Finals, it’s my belief the Knicks (ole skool) are facing the Spurs (new skool). Knick fans I’m not hinting your team is old, I am simply pointing out the manner it was built, your Knicks were constructed mostly through trades and free-agency. On the other hand the Spurs were for the most part built through the draft although they too have a smaller number acquired in trades. Losing places a team in an advantageous position to acquire talent and they were in a position to choose a superstar in Wemby but the other guys ain’t too bad. It’s my contention that the recent 7-game series between the Thunder and Spurs is the future of the NBA in a variety of ways the chief one how to build successful teams. I’m including the Thunder in the conversation too.

Both teams were built through the NBA draft, I realize most fans have a “win-now” attitude however if you make a bunch of trades and sign a bunch of free agents and still don’t win what have you accomplished? I cannot speak to the manner the Spurs were built however I can with the Thunder. General manager Sam Presti has been quite diligent and insightful in drafting players if memory serves me correctly SGA and Isiah Hartenstein are the only trade/free agent acquisitions by the Thunder. Much of the balance of their roster I believe was built through the draft. Shrewd moves and scouting of prospects is required by a front office, who is responsible for the decision for the Spurs I’m unsure however I intend to cite Dylan Harper as our example. The Spurs had 2024 NBA Rookie of the Year Stephon Castle and veteran DeAaron Fox as starters in the backcourt. Despite this fact when their turn came in the 2025 NBA draft they chose Harper another guard with the 2nd pick in the first round. The drafting of Harper proved to be one of those successful moves infusing additional youthful talent into the Spurs lineup.

Forward Carter Bryant is a little “rough” around the edges, he was not as schooled as his fellow rookie teammate Harper. Despite my statement this playoff has also become a baptism of fire for him as well. Although the Thunder lost the series I believe they and the Spurs have pointed the way to the future for other NBA teams. Utilize the draft sign a small number of free agents and make even fewer trades. This is a long held belief of mine, often we fail to realize we are in the midst of an event that brings about change never anticipated. What do I know, I’m just a basketball fan coaching from my television.